<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Government designs bureaucratic top-heavy health boards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freedomcentral.org.uk/2009/12/government-designs-bureaucratic-top-heavy-health-boards.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freedomcentral.org.uk/2009/12/government-designs-bureaucratic-top-heavy-health-boards.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:50:21 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: treborc</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomcentral.org.uk/2009/12/government-designs-bureaucratic-top-heavy-health-boards.html/comment-page-1#comment-2798</link>
		<dc:creator>treborc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomcentral.org.uk/?p=2559#comment-2798</guid>
		<description>Yes if any jobs did go it would be from the lower tiers, New labour and Labours ideals they cannot live with out big earners but can live easy without the backing of the working class</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes if any jobs did go it would be from the lower tiers, New labour and Labours ideals they cannot live with out big earners but can live easy without the backing of the working class</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank H Little</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomcentral.org.uk/2009/12/government-designs-bureaucratic-top-heavy-health-boards.html/comment-page-1#comment-2767</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank H Little</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomcentral.org.uk/?p=2559#comment-2767</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;not a single administrator’s job was lost when NHS Wales underwent a major reorganisation in October&lt;/i&gt;

- as cynics predicted. If I remember correctly, a reduction in the cost of administration was near the top of Edwina Hart&#039;s list justifying the changes. 

What this also means is that the ratio of elected &quot;stakeholders&quot; to staff has gone down.

&lt;i&gt;People expect [...] not to bankroll administrators and bureaucrats&lt;/i&gt;
 - too many of whom are close to the administration in Cardiff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>not a single administrator’s job was lost when NHS Wales underwent a major reorganisation in October</i></p>
<p>- as cynics predicted. If I remember correctly, a reduction in the cost of administration was near the top of Edwina Hart&#8217;s list justifying the changes. </p>
<p>What this also means is that the ratio of elected &#8220;stakeholders&#8221; to staff has gone down.</p>
<p><i>People expect [...] not to bankroll administrators and bureaucrats</i><br />
 &#8211; too many of whom are close to the administration in Cardiff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
