<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hain starts New Year as he finished the old one</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freedomcentral.org.uk/2010/01/hain-starts-new-year-as-he-finished-the-old-one.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freedomcentral.org.uk/2010/01/hain-starts-new-year-as-he-finished-the-old-one.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:21:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomcentral.org.uk/2010/01/hain-starts-new-year-as-he-finished-the-old-one.html/comment-page-1#comment-2979</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomcentral.org.uk/?p=2621#comment-2979</guid>
		<description>The real irony of the Welsh Language LCO is that it could in fact undermine existing legislation by embedding the requirement for a right to a review into the any changes made to the Welsh Language Act, 1993. 

The requirement for a any subsequent Measure to have an appeal based on &quot;reasonableness&quot; and &quot;proportionality&quot; means that even relatively minor changes, such as increasing the need to have a Welsh Language plan drawn up every 4 years (instead of every 5) would allow each body to request a review.

So Plaid Cymru&#039;s Welsh Language LCO actually reduces some of the legal protections currently offered to the langauge.

I understand that some would consider this a reasonable trade-off for the new powers over Commissioners and official langauge status but ,to be honest, it shouldn&#039;t have been beyond the wit of man to draw up an LCO that offered both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real irony of the Welsh Language LCO is that it could in fact undermine existing legislation by embedding the requirement for a right to a review into the any changes made to the Welsh Language Act, 1993. </p>
<p>The requirement for a any subsequent Measure to have an appeal based on &#8220;reasonableness&#8221; and &#8220;proportionality&#8221; means that even relatively minor changes, such as increasing the need to have a Welsh Language plan drawn up every 4 years (instead of every 5) would allow each body to request a review.</p>
<p>So Plaid Cymru&#8217;s Welsh Language LCO actually reduces some of the legal protections currently offered to the langauge.</p>
<p>I understand that some would consider this a reasonable trade-off for the new powers over Commissioners and official langauge status but ,to be honest, it shouldn&#8217;t have been beyond the wit of man to draw up an LCO that offered both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by rhyddidcanolog</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomcentral.org.uk/2010/01/hain-starts-new-year-as-he-finished-the-old-one.html/comment-page-1#comment-2973</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by rhyddidcanolog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 10:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomcentral.org.uk/?p=2621#comment-2973</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by rhyddidcanolog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by rhyddidcanolog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

